They are invisible or they are the process.

Interviewee: Mary Jane Jacob

Right and they are invisible or they are the process. If we are hung up on searching for the art work according to some definition, and if we say that the process is so big and manifold that we can’t talk to the participants and public, then we will never know what this work is about. And even if we do not talk to these people, we can at least turn to our own experiences in life, practice empathy to understand how the process of experience and of art has transpired in our life. We can put some trust in our own experience. If, as a critic, you are do not literalize this in some way, either by believing that this work is art or listening to those voices that know it is and who have had the  art experience, then you stay in this world of pronouncing judgement on whether this art is right. Might it not be better to illuminate the potential of these art practices?